Adam Caruso Ai Wei Wei Alain De Botton Aldo Rossi Alejandro Aravena Alejandro Zaera-Polo Alexis Rochas Alvar Aalto Alvaro Siza Amancio Williams Anish Kapoor Anthony Vidler Antoine Predock Arata Isozaki Archigram Bernard Khoury Bernard Tschumi Bernd and Hilla Becher Bjarke Ingels Brian Eno Buckminster Fuller Carlo Scarpa Cecil Balmond Cesar Pelli Charles Eames Charles Gwathmey Charles Moore Charles Rennie Mackintosh Christian Kerez Christo and Jeanne-Claude Claude Nicolas Ledoux Colin Rowe Communication Craig Dykers Daniel Libeskind David Adjaye David Byrne David Childs David Chipperfield David Hotson David Macaulay Diller and Scofidio Elizabeth Diller Emilio Ambasz Emilio Tunon Eric Owen Moss Eva Franch Gilabert Francis Alys Francis Kere Frank Gehry Frank Lloyd Wright Fumihiko Maki Gaetano Pesce Gilles Deleuze Giovanni Battista Piranesi Glenn Murcutt Greg Lynn Gunnar Asplund Hani Rashid Hans Ulrich Obrist Hector Guimard Herzog & De Meuron I.M. Pei Iannis Xenakis Jacques Derrida Jacques Herzog James Casebere James Kunstler James Stirling James Turrell Jean Giraud Jean Nouvel Jean Prouve Jeanne Gang Jesse Reiser John Hejduk John Pawson John Soane Jorn Utzon Joseph Grima Joshua Prince Ramus Juhani Pallasmaa julius shulman Jurgen Mayer Kengo Kuma Kenneth Frampton Kevin Roche Konstantin Melnikov Le Corbusier Lebbeus Woods Louis Kahn Louis Sullivan Lucius Burckhardt Luis Barragan Luis Mansilla Lyndon Neri Makiko Tsukada Manuel Delanda Marcel Breuer Mark Wigley Mauricio Pezo Michael Govan Michael Graves Michael Sorkin Mies van der rohe Moshe Safdie Nader Tehrani Nanako Umemoto Nathaniel Kahn Neil Denari Norman Foster Olafur Eliasson Oscar Niemeyer Otto Wagner Oulipo Paolo Antonelli Paul Rudolph Peter Cook Peter Eisenman Peter St. John Peter Zumthor Pezo Von Ellrichshausen Philip Johnson phillipe rahm Pierre Chareau Pierre De Meuron Preston Scott Cohen R.M. Schindler Rafael Moneo Rafael Vinoly Raimund Abraham Ray Eames Rem Koolhaas Renzo Piano RIchard Meier Richard Neutra Richard Rogers Richard Serra Robert Irwin Robert Slutzky Robert Smithson Robert Venturi Rod Sheard Ron Arad Ryue Nishizawa Santiago Calatrava Shigeru Ban Shin Takamatsu Slavoj Zizek Smiljan Radic Snohetta Sofia Von Ellrichshausen Sou Fujimoto Stan Allen Stanley Tigerman Steven Holl Sugimoto Sverre Fehn Tadao Ando Teddy Cruz Thom Mayne Thomas Heatherwick Todd Hido Tom Kundig Tony fretton Toyo Ito Valerio Olgiati Victor Horta Vladimir Tatlin Walter Gropius Whitney Sander Will Alsop Wolf Prix Zaha Hadid

Juhani Pallasmaa: Transcript

Found a great interview with Pallasmaa

Q. Your architecture discourse covers a range of tipping points for the realms of - cultural philosophy, environmental psychology theories of architecture and the arts- how would you define the practice of architecture today?
A. I have always been interested in different things and I am unwilling to acknowledge or fear boundaries; usually the most interesting new things emerge at the boundaries. This overall interest in phenomena of life and knowledge arise from my childhood experiences at my farmer grandfather’s solitary and humble farm in Finland during the war years in the 1940s. In those days every farmer had to know a lot of things and master numerous skills in order to survive – the only specialists were the priest and the black smith. My sense of curiosity is a farmer’s interest in the land, weather and the incredible richness of life and besides, maintaining your sense of curiosity is probably the best way of fighting the negative consequences of aging.
In today’s world, architectural practice has broken into countless specializations and turned into a professionalist business. I personally continue to see architecture in wide humanistic and non-professionalist terms, as a rewarding journey through life. For me, architecture is still a means of confronting the great enigma of human existence. Of course, on a practical level, the task of architecture is to create places and spaces for specific purposes, but more importantly, architecture creates frames and horizons of perception and understanding, the understanding of the historicity and continuity of culture and things, human institutions, relationships, and finally, understanding oneself.

Q. Continuing on the similar thread, with your double edged exposure to academics and practice please share the importance in taking detours in earning/ experience process. Is there a role play of architectural pedagogy in architectural development?
A. I have always found it important to learn from other disciplines: the visual arts, sciences, cinema, literature, poetry, philosophy etc. This is my personal “paracentric” understanding of architecture. Architecture and arts are primarily about human life and there is no better education for that dimension than reading novels.
In my role as a teacher, I am primarily concerned with the self-awareness and self-identity of each individual student. The primary role of education is to set the student’s soul on fire and to evoke a sense of curiosity and responsibility. The task of education is to teach the student to see, experience and think. Most of the professional skills are achieved later through professional practice. Without the appropriate mind-set and horizon, professionalist education is useless.

Q. How important are detours in the shaping of a practice. Please share with us experiences and some significant practices that exemplify them.
A. Architecture is, of course, practiced in a multitude of ways, particularly if you consider cultural differences. The colleagues of mine around the world that I mostly admire, such as Glenn Murcutt, Renzo Piano, Sverre Fehn, Colin St.John Wison, Peter Zumthor, Steven Holl, Frank Gehry etc. are/were all very widely interested in the entire spectrum of human culture. Particularly the interaction of arts and architecture, the role of the crafts and the art of clear thinking are important.

Q. Do share the essence of the ‘Global’ Practice today...
A. I do not consider my practice at all a “global practice”, although I have done some projects in various countries. I have never been interested to expand my practice beyond my own country and the studio size of my office. My writings seem to have found a surprisingly wide readership, but that is another matter. I never sought to have a wide readership, either, I just write what and when I am asked to. As I am writing, I am thinking of some of my wisest and most critical friends; they are my imaginary readers and public – I write for my friends in my imagination.

Q. How does patronage play a role in the evolution of architecture? What takes priority at the time of decision making - a client’s priority or an architects’ ambition from the project. Especially in the context of detours and experiments in design it would be wonderful if you could examine the above with project experiences?
A. As the American poet Walt Whitman said: “Great poetry is possible only if there are great readers”. In architecture, likewise, enlightened clients and occupants have an equally important role. However, a profound architect needs to identify himself fully with his/her client/user and design for this internalised other. It is the architect’s duty to project a vision of a better world and make the client understand and desire this vision. Profound architecture arises from ideals of a better world and more responsible, sensitive, perceptive and compassionate humankind. A profound design process eventually makes the patron, the architect and every occasional visitor in the building a slightly better human being. “Be like me”, is the subliminal ethical message of every great piece of poetry, as Joseph Brodsky, the Nobel laureate poet argues, and the same applies to architecture. Or, as another master poet, Rainer
Maria Rilke writes: “Art is not only a little selective sample of the world; it is a transforming of the world, an endless transformation towards the good”.

Q. Any other directions and advice that you would like to exemplify for “Paracentric Practices” for our readers. .
A. At the same time that we need to expand the realm of architecture, we need to focus on its very cultural and mental essence, the existential core of the art of architecture. At times when architecture or any art form, looses its meaning and emotive power, one must go back to the origins, the source of mental meaning. Architecture must have a double focus: it is about the world and life, but it is simultaneously about the eternal essence of architecture itself.

Will Alsop on John Soane

Trying to find a longer video on Soane....


Moshe Safdie: On Building Uniqueness (TED)


Daniel Libeskind: Talks about several projects including World Trade Center 


Shin Takamatsu: Essay and Lecture Synopsis

I can't find any audio or video relating to Takamatsu. However I did find a couple of interesting essays, one from and one from which I will include as downloadable files at the bottom of the post...and a synopsis of a lecture given by Takamatsu in 2002 which I grabbed from which is below the following images.

Syntax, the building above was demolished in 2007. I learned this recently and am baffled by what they replaced it with...check it...

Origin 1 (1981) (Image Courtesy Takamatsu's Website)

The Ark (1983) (Courtesy Takamatsu's Website)

Synopsis of 2002 lecture from Archined

By: Janneke van Bergen
Translation: Billy Nolan

Shin Takamatsu gave a lecture at the Berlage Institute. Japanese architecture is back in fashion again. Last autumn the Berlage staged an exhibition on trends in European and Japanese architecture, and the University of Technology in Delft is currently running a lecture series devoted to Japanese design practice. Just how different Japanese practice is became clear in the lecture 'Hard-boiled architecture'. Janneke van Bergen reports.

The presentation itself amounted to a statement: no words but deeds. So Shin began with a twenty-minute-long slide show, to the hard beats of Leftfield, Daft Punk and Underworld. Images of old and new work, countless forms and buildings, flitted by. The projects, futuristic and uncompromising, were imprinted as emblems on the mind. This torrent caused a nervous giggle to ripple through the audience. Besides architecture, Shin also showed lots of atmospheric images and cinematic interior perspectives, and it was as if you could actually. step into the virtual spaces.

Then there was Shin himself. Speaking in short Japanese sentences, he told of his father, a fisherman, who distrusted people who talked too much, for they scared the fish away. Or as Shin added: 'Architecture says more than words. I think I should vanish from the site now…' A very humble attitude for a man who usually makes large, monumental architecture.

During the lecture the audience was taken swiftly through a number of recent projects, with few words from an interpreter. Remarkably, the weighty and brusque quality of his earlier work, which many particularly appreciate, is lacking in these projects. With their white flowing forms, transparent and slender structures, they are almost transcendental. The similarity to his earlier work is in terms of scale, geometry and emblematic composition. All projects are detailed to perfection. The recently completed temples in Higashi and Myokinzan are memorable. Here, monumental architecture is subservient to religion, and tradition and intervention merge seamlessly with each other.

In the other projects architecture again assumes the main role, and little is said of the siting. Shin's terse, ironic commentary focuses on the political situation, on whether the major was or wasn't re-elected after completion. Transcendentalism started to merge with power-craving architecture. Two of Shin's current projects are in Moscow, where after the recession in Asia the money can be made. Three-dimensional facades, glass floors, crystal interiors: giggles in the audience again.

The apotheosis consisted of two animated films in which mystic music accompanied us on a journey through a number of Utopian buildings, complete with sunset and dazzling fireworks. Shin managed to put them into perspective by telling us that they were made for planning application purposes, but the giggling still gave way to loud laughter. The cultural difference was clear. Architecture like this is only possible in a country where conformity is the order of the day, for our polder-model society fractures easily into countless fragments. Shin translates these Utopias into reality, with great care and precision, and great rarity (the only way to turn such visions into stunning architecture).

The question from the audience, whether it is possible to design a building with other people, is answered in the negative. In every project, Shin embarks on an introspective search for images, which he captures in drawings. His buildings embody the ideas and signature of just one person, and that is himself. With that, the romance of the 'fisherman's son becoming famous architect' was broken forever. It also explains the title of the lecture: hard-boiled architecture. Shin used to read lots of hard-boiled detective stories. And that's how he sees himself, obedient to his own rules and laws. And practical tips? Be good in politics, ventured Wiel Arets. 'To understand fish is to understand men', my neighbour jested. And nobody knows that better than Shin.

Shin Takamatsu Essays


Claude Nicolas Ledoux: Saltworks Documentary


Walter Gropius: Bauhaus Documentary





Jean Nouvel: Nemausus 1 Documentary (English)